Address: Marshal Zhukov Ul. 51, Moscow 123154, Metro Oktyabrskoye Pole
Here you can submit your claim and supporting documents online.
– Public affairs and media office
– Human resources department
New videos
ADVANTAGES OF OUR ARBITRATION
Fast processing of claims
A claim is processed on the 10th working day from the date of its filing. By law, the decision of the Arbitration Court comes into legal effect immediately and is not subject to appeal (anywhere else).State support in the enforcement of decisions
The state enforcement order is issued for the Court decisions in 30-50 days (against financial guarantees of the Court).Real debt collection
The court provides free-of-charge assistance in processing and filing executive documents to the debtor's bank or the bailiff service, with further monitoring of their execution until the return of debts. Organizing the work of collectors.Qualified and independent judges
Requirements to the judges - higher legal education and 5 years of work experience in a particular industry.
A judge is chosen by the parties of the Presidium, ensuring the independence of the process. Personal data of judges is completely closed.Assistance in preparation for court
Prior to filing a lawsuit the court provides free advice on procedural matters.Regional availability
The Court reviews the claims to regional and foreign Defendants in Moscow or via Skype.Financial cost-effectiveness
A single court deals with claims both to legal entities and natural persons. 10 times lower expenses than with a state court.- Official Arbitration Court for the Government of Moscow and Moscow region, members of Moscow Office of "Delovaya Rossya", the Association of Regional Banks of Russia, the Association of Moscow Investors, the Leasing Union, the Builders Association of Russia, the Association "Oboronstroy", 19 guilds, 38 SRO (self-regulating organizations of the construction complex.
Arbitration Clauses & Agreements
1) A arbitration clause for alternative arrangements at the State Court (recommended):
“All disputes under this agreement are held in open session at the discretion of the plaintiff: in state court or in the Moscow Arbitration Court (for transferal to resolution and administration via “arbitration court established for the purpose of resolving a particular dispute” under the sole chairmanship of Judge A.V. Kravtsov in accordance with its rules as posted on the website www.a-tsm.ru). The parties have familiarized themselves with the rules of the Arbitration Court. Participation of the parties and arbitrator in the meetings is allowed by videoconference. The resolution of the arbitration tribunal is final. The enforcement order is issued at the place of arbitration.”
2) А arbitration clause without option:
“All disputes under this agreement are held in open session in the Moscow Arbitration Court (for transferal to resolution and administration via “arbitration court established for the purpose of resolving a particular dispute” under the sole chairmanship of Judge A.V. Kravtsov in accordance with its rules as posted on the website www.a-tsm.ru). The parties have familiarized themselves with the rules of the Arbitration Court. Participation of the parties and arbitrator in the meetings is allowed by videoconference. The resolution of the arbitration tribunal is final. The enforcement order is issued at the place of arbitration.”
3)А arbitration clause with compensation:
“All disputes under this agreement are held in open session at the discretion of the plaintiff: in state court or in the Moscow Arbitration Court (for transferal to resolution and administration via “arbitration court established for the purpose of resolving a particular dispute” under the sole chairmanship of Judge A.V. Kravtsov in accordance with its rules as posted on the website www.a-tsm.ru). The parties have familiarized themselves with the rules of the Arbitration Court. Participation of the parties and arbitrator in the meetings is allowed by videoconference. The resolution of the arbitration tribunal is final. The enforcement order is issued at the place of arbitration.”
“The parties agree that all costs associated with the enforcement of the Arbitration Court’s decision are borne by the losing party and are subject to voluntary reimbursement to the prevailing party within three working days of the date of submission of the relevant written request. The aforementioned costs include: engaging legal entities or individuals to obtain in state court an enforcement order for the enforcement of the decision of the Arbitration Court and all related actions; engaging legal entities or individuals to search for, transport and store the property of the losing party during the enforcement stage of the proceedings or to secure a claim and all related actions; payment of state fees; engaging translators; copying, notarial services and other certification of documents; postage expenses; and other associated costs. In case of non-fulfillment of these obligations on a voluntary basis, the party incurring the costs of enforcing the decision of the Arbitration Court has the right, in a separate suit and at its discretion, to file a claim for reimbursement of these expenses with the Moscow Arbitration Court (for transferal to resolution and administration via “arbitration court established for the purpose of resolving a particular dispute” under the sole chairmanship of Judge A.V. Kravtsov in accordance with its rules as posted on the website www.a-tsm.ru)or to the appropriate state court.”
Please note!
1) For supplementary amendment contracts: in the arbitration agreement it is essential to add an item about the procedure of making alterations in the arbitration agreement. (“The introduction of amendments to this arbitration agreement is possible by bringing the required protocol to the Bank no later than 5 working days before the Agreement comes into force”). Failing this, in accordance with Clause 3 Section 5 of Federal Law FZ-102, the arbitration agreement must be entered into only after disputes arise.
2) For Consumer Credit Agreements:“The borrower and the lender have the right to conclude an arbitration agreement about the resolution of disputes in a consumer credit agreement (loan) only after grounds for such a claim have arisen. (The RF Law 353-F3 of 21st Dec 2013 “Concerning consumer credit” came into force on 01.07.2014) Explanation: from 01.07.2014 arbitration agreements may be concluded as supplementary agreements after default, or alternatively as a separate agreement after the first default. Claims under consumer credit agreements taken out before 01.07.2014 are heard by the normal process.